FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 15 May 2012

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MeetingPlace ID: 0000; Join the meeting; Dial-in number: 877-453-7266  1 p.m. Mountain time on Tuesdays

  • You can join up to 10 minutes early. If you try to join the meeting at any other time, you will get an error that the meeting doesn't exist.
  • Prior to joining the meeting for the first time, run the MeetingPlace Test to verify that you can participate in a web meeting.

Purpose of the meeting

Improve the Wiki

  • Forge solutions with other community contributors.
  • Share best practices, ideas, and content.
  • Discuss current issues, community matters, and strategies.
  • Move issues to decision.

Introduce new members[edit | edit source]

Kudos go to ...[edit | edit source]

  • Re-wording of Stub template (Massachussets) 
  • Jane Colmenares - Ohio & Alabama

Updates and follow up[edit | edit source]

  • Is anyone clicking through to Forums from the Wiki? Nathan has Site Catalyst results. Murphynw 17:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Forums pages were recently moved and the new pages don't have the catalyst code on them so  we need to have the engineers replace that code.
  • Elder Meyers and Elder Riggs did look at pages with links to Fourms on them in the Wiki, but only one page showed up.  
  • We don't have a firm answer on whether the link is being used and could be eliminated from the Nav box

Business/Announcements[edit | edit source]

  • 1000 Link Limit --- Linkpendium. Is this a problem? Murphynw 17:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
  • If you go directly to the link, it doesn't link to Linkpendium.  
  • Should we have a  style guide that says to not harvest links from Linkpendium.
  • It might be good to create an article about Linkpendium and have links to larger categories.
  • Wholesale harvesting of links from Linkpendium should be noted as being unethical.
  • Style Guide- how we use link aggregators - deep linking, harvesting
  • Template:Linkpendium has resources for this county (example)?  Then the researcher finds the link there, himself.
  • There should be verbage with links, that gives information, not just a list of links.
  • Our main objective is to help the researcher.  If we don't have the information, links to other sites that do have it, could be used.  There should be a purpose for sending them from the Wiki.
  • Migration pages could be good models.
  • The fewer clicks, the better.
  • Nathan volunteered to write this up.
  • We need to have more discussion on "ethical" versus "legal" (Wilma)
  • Approach Linkpendium about extending the 1,000 limit - Darris or the library (Nathan, Danielle)

Moderators and Adopters[edit | edit source]

Style Guide Discussions[edit | edit source]

Project Help Requests[edit | edit source]

Need help with your project? See a project that needs to be done? Add it here:

Training Requests[edit | edit source]

Improve the Wiki[edit | edit source]

Forums Overview[edit | edit source]

Be part of the solution! Make your opinions known! Post comments to an existing thread or start a new discussion at Wiki Contributors Corner forum.
Current forum threads of interest:


New since last week

Comments added since last week

Decisions made since last week

Be bold! Post your agenda items!

Feel free to post on the agenda any items you wish to discuss during the meeting. If your item requires details or feedback, post them on the discussion page and link to them from the agenda.