Soliciting your opinion[edit source]
Hey Wilma, will you weigh in on "Local Histories" or "Histories" heading on county pages? I want to reach consensus on this quickly in order to get a big missionary team engaged in FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives. I'm asking for your opinion because you notice issues I overlook. Thanks in advance! Ritcheymt 13:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I like the term "Local Histories" for two reasons:
- The title "Histories" could invite date-related information rather than resources.
- It could easily be confused with the "History" section toward the top -- which should be inviting date-related info.
- It is clearer for the author and the user that these are more likely to be county, town, or regional resources than state-level resources.
Other than that, it does not matter a whole lot. However, if it is changed, it should be put where it fits alphabetically.
To all FamilySearch Wiki Contributors: An apology is in order...[edit source]
By way of introduction, my name is Ben Bennett and I’ve recently joined the FamilySearch team as the product manager for the Wiki and Forums. Put simply, my job is to ensure that your experience, as contributors and users of the Wiki and Forums is excellent. To this end, an apology is in order.
As you know, we recently implemented a new user ID/sign in process for the FamilySearch Wiki. As we implemented this new system, I personally heard from many of you. You shared with me problems that were occurring for you as you tried to sign in, edit or do other things that resulted in lost work, lost time and frustration for you, our key contributors and users. Please accept my sincere apology for the poor performance and poor experience associated with the Wiki during the past few weeks. Please also accept my commitment that the FamilySearch team will learn from this experience and do all that we can to prevent situations like this in the future. To this end, I wanted to share with you ...CONTINUE